ALD and CVD Beginner’s Complete Guide: Mechanisms, Process Branches, Application Scenarios, and a Selection Decision Tree

Introduction

1. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD, Chemical Vapor Deposition): Volatile precursors are delivered into a reaction chamber, where they react and/or decompose on the substrate surface to continuously grow a thin film—typically at a higher deposition rate.

2. Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD, Atomic Layer Deposition): Precursors A and B are introduced in separate pulses. Each step proceeds via sequential, self-limiting half-reactions on the surface. Film thickness is built up by cycle count—usually slower, but more controllable and with stronger conformality.

Key takeaway in one sentence:

1. Want fast, mature, high-throughput → you typically think of CVD first.

2. Want ultrathin precision control and uniform coating on complex 3D structures → you typically think of ALD first.

Shared Background: What Is “Thin-Film Deposition,” and Why Does It Matter?

Many modern technologies (chips, displays, solar cells, wear/corrosion-resistant coatings, sensors, catalytic/battery interfacial layers) essentially rely on using films from a few nanometers to a few micrometers to modify surfaces or build device structures. The advantages of vapor-phase deposition include:

1. High film purity/density and strong process controllability;

2. Capability for large-area processing and complex material systems;

3. Compatibility with micro-/nano-fabrication workflows (especially in microelectronic
s).

A few key terms to know first:

1. Precursor: A “feedstock molecule” that can be vaporized and participate in the reaction.

2. Conformality: Whether thickness is consistent on sidewalls/bottoms of steps, trenches, and deep holes.

3. Aspect ratio (AR): Structure “depth/width”; the larger it is, the harder it is to deposit uniformly.

4. Thermal budget: The maximum temperature a process can tolerate (too high may damage devices/substrates/previously formed layers).

These concepts determine why you would choose CVD or ALD later on.

Part A | Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)

A1. Definition: What Exactly Is CVD?

Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) is a class of vapor-phase deposition methods: one or more volatile precursors are introduced into a reaction chamber; chemical reactions and/or decomposition occur on the substrate surface to form a solid thin film, while gaseous byproducts are pumped away.

Intuitive analogy: CVD is like “continuous cooking”—reactant gases are continuously supplied, surface reactions proceed continuously, and the film grows continuously.

A2. Principle: How Does the Film “Grow”?

You can break CVD down into a general chain of mass transport + surface chemistry (reactor details differ, but the logic is broadly applicable):

1. Reactants travel from the main gas flow to the vicinity of the substrate (convection/diffusion)

2. Reactants adsorb on the surface (adsorption)

3. Surface reactions/decomposition form a solid network (surface reaction)

4. Byproducts desorb from the surface (desorption)

5. Byproducts diffuse back to the main flow and are pumped away

What limits the rate? CVD growth rate is commonly governed by two types of bottlenecks:

1. Surface-reaction-kinetics-limited: temperature and activation barriers matter more;

2. Mass-transport-limited: gas diffusion and boundary-layer transport matter more.

3. This is key to understanding why process windows can vary so widely across different CVD processes.

A3. Quick Overview of Common CVD Variants

In real engineering practice, CVD is often branched by pressure, energy source, precursor/epitaxy attributes, and application orientation.

Classification dimension	Process branch (acronym)	Full name	Core characteristics	Typical use cases	Notes / cautions
Pressure	APCVD	Atmospheric-Pressure CVD	Operates near atmospheric pressure; relatively convenient for equipment/line integration; suitable for continuous processing and large areas	In-line large-area films; some functional coatings and glass coating, etc.	At higher pressure, gas-phase side reactions and boundary-layer transport effects are often more pronounced; particle formation and uniformity depend strongly on chemistry and engineering control
Pressure	LPCVD	Low-Pressure CVD	Sub-atmospheric operation; often improves uniformity and repeatability; very common in microelectronics	Batch furnace deposition of polysilicon, silicon nitride, and some oxide films	Many systems require higher deposition temperatures (material dependent), so thermal budget must be assessed; equipment is often batch furnace-based
Pressure / equipment context	RPCVD	Reduced-Pressure CVD	Often used in a “single-wafer tool” reduced-pressure context (engineering implementation differs from furnace LPCVD)	Stronger single-wafer control; tighter integration with advanced-node processes	The terminology “RPCVD vs LPCVD” is not perfectly consistent across companies/literature
Energy source	PECVD	Plasma-Enhanced CVD	Plasma generates highly reactive species → significantly lowers deposition temperature; suited for temperature-sensitive or back-end steps	Low-temperature dielectrics, passivation layers, packaging/display-related films	Trade-offs: plasma may cause damage/charge defects; film density, stress, hydrogen content, etc. may differ from thermal CVD and require parameter-window optimization
Precursor type	MOCVD	Metal-Organic CVD	Uses metal-organic (or metal complex) precursors; commonly used for compound semiconductor growth	III–V and nitride systems; device materials and epitaxy-related processes	High requirements for precursor purity, gas-phase reaction control, exhaust treatment, and safety; demands strong reactor design and process stability
Epitaxy emphasis	MOVPE	Metal-Organic Vapor Phase Epitaxy	Same origin as MOCVD, but emphasizes the epitaxial (single-crystal) growth context	Epitaxial layers for LEDs, lasers, power/RF devices (e.g., GaN family)	Often used nearly interchangeably with MOCVD in practice; MOVPE more explicitly stresses epitaxy
Application orientation (gap fill)	SACVD	Sub-Atmospheric CVD	Typically targeted at dielectric trench/via gap fill, optimized for “fill completely with fewer voids”	Dielectric fill in high-AR structures (commonly oxide systems)	Process window and flow/reaction control are more complex; not “universally better,” but “more suitable for gap-fill tasks”

A4. Typical Characteristics of CVD (Pros and Cons)

Dimension	Typical behavior	Why it matters	Common countermeasures / optimization directions
Rate & throughput (advantage)	Continuous supply and continuous reaction (note: pulsed/sequential CVD also exists, which sits between the two); deposition rate is typically higher	Suitable for thicker films and high-throughput manufacturing	Under acceptable film quality, improve stable mass production via temperature/pressure/flow control and reactor design
Broad material coverage (advantage)	Covers many silicon-based dielectrics/nitrides, carbon materials, compound semiconductors, etc.	One platform can expand across different products/tasks	Choose different CVD branches (LPCVD/PECVD/MOCVD…) to match thermal budget and material requirements
Many process “forms” (advantage)	Flexible routes based on pressure and energy source	The “same target film” can be realized via multiple process solutions	Low-temperature needs → PECVD first; epitaxy needs → MOVPE/MOCVD; large-area continuous lines → APCVD
Conformality on 3D structures may be insufficient (limitation)	Deep holes/trenches often show thinner sidewalls/bottoms and non-uniform thickness	Advanced devices are increasingly 3D; this directly impacts electrical performance and reliability	For gap-fill tasks, pivot to SACVD or other more suitable routes; for extreme conformality, evaluate switching to ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition)
Gas-phase side reactions / particle risk (limitation)	Some chemistries react in the gas phase, forming particles/powder → defects/yield loss	Microelectronics and optical films are highly defect-sensitive	Reduce pressure, dilute reactants, segment temperature zones, optimize flow field/showerhead, purify precursors, and manage cleaning cycles
Temperature & precursor safety (limitation)	Thermal CVD often uses higher temperatures; some precursors are flammable/corrosive/toxic	Impacts thermal budget, fab safety, and compliance	Use PECVD for lower temperature (while balancing film quality/damage); strengthen exhaust treatment, leak monitoring, and material-compatibility assessments

A5. Development Timeline

The evolution of CVD

1. Earlier start and earlier industrialization: CVD entered engineering applications early as a vapor-phase film/layer formation method.

2. Microelectronics drove rapid branching: As ICs demanded higher uniformity, repeatability, and contamination control, low-pressure routes (e.g., LPCVD) became key tools.

3. Low-temperature needs led to PECVD: Plasma enhancement was introduced to reduce thermal budget, enabling many films to be deposited at lower temperatures.

4. Compound semiconductors built the MOCVD/MOVPE industrial chain: For LEDs, power devices, and RF devices, metal-organic routes became major epitaxy manufacturing platforms.

A6. Major Application Areas

Industry / task	Common CVD branches	Typical films / roles	Why it’s commonly used
Microelectronic films (dielectric/passivation/barrier, etc.)	LPCVD, PECVD, RPCVD	Dielectrics, passivation layers, barrier layers, functional layers, etc.	Mature processes, integrable, controllable throughput and cost; different branches match thermal budget and film-quality needs
Dielectric gap fill in 3D structures (gap fill)	SACVD (may also be combined with other CVD routes)	Fill-type dielectric layers for trenches/vias (often oxide systems)	The goal is not “fastest,” but “fill completely, minimize voids, control morphology”
Compound semiconductor materials / epitaxy	MOCVD, MOVPE	Epitaxial layers of III–V and nitrides (active layers, buffer layers, etc.)	Mature epitaxy supply chain; well-suited for LED/laser/power and RF device manufacturing
Functional coatings & materials engineering	APCVD, PECVD (route depends on chemistry)	Wear/corrosion resistance, diffusion barriers, optical films, surface modification layers	Suitable for large-area or batch production; branch selection can match temperature/substrate/film-quality requirements
Carbon-based material growth (example)	(Chemistry-specific CVD routes)	Carbon nanomaterials, some carbon thin films, etc.	Continuous supply/reaction facilitates scale-up (highly dependent on chemistry and equipment)

A7. Current Status, Challenges, and Outlook

Current status: CVD remains one of the main workhorse tools for thin-film manufacturing—especially when mature material systems, throughput, and process integration are required. However, with more complex 3D structures and tighter thermal budgets, the pressure on process windows and defect control continues to rise.

Challenges: what you may face, why, and what is commonly done

Main challenge	Common causes	Common response directions
Lower temperature while maintaining film quality/reliability	Lower temperature slows reactions and may reduce film density; plasma introduces additional variables	Use PECVD or gentler plasma strategies; evaluate density/stress/electrical reliability together—not deposition temperature alone
Particle & defect control	Gas-phase side reactions, wall deposition, local supersaturation, and unstable flow fields can all amplify particle risk	Reduce pressure and dilute reactants; optimize temperature zoning and flow fields (showerhead/reactor design); stabilize gas delivery and purify precursors; define cleaning and monitoring strategies
3D uniformity (high AR)	In deep holes/trenches it’s “hard to get in and hard to get out”; mass-transport limitation causes sidewall/bottom thickness mismatch	Task splitting: prioritize SACVD for gap fill; if the goal is extreme conformality and ultrathin precision control, evaluate switching to ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition) or using hybrid strategies
Safety, environment, and compliance	Precursors may be flammable/corrosive/toxic, and exhaust byproducts require treatment	Strengthen exhaust treatment, material compatibility, leak monitoring, and operating procedures; treat “chemical supply chain and compliance” as hard selection criteria

Outlook

The main CVD directions typically concentrate on three themes: lower temperature, fewer defects (particles/voids), and stronger 3D uniformity. Meanwhile, process development will increasingly rely on in-line metrology, process modeling, and reactor engineering, shifting manufacturability from experience-driven toward data- and model-driven approaches.

Part B | Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)

B1. Definition: What Is ALD?

Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD, Atomic Layer Deposition) is a vapor-phase thin-film deposition technique whose core ideas are:

· Precursors are introduced sequentially and separately (not mixed and fed simultaneously);

· Each step proceeds via a self-limiting surface reaction (once surface sites are saturated, the reaction stops);

· Layer-by-layer growth is achieved by repeating cycles, enabling angstrom-level (Å-level) thickness control and excellent conformality.

Intuitive analogy: ALD is like “painting in steps”—precursor A comes in and reacts only until it “can’t paint any further,” then it is cleared; precursor B comes in and reacts to saturation, then it is cleared; repeat N times and the thickness stacks up reliably.

B2. Principle: What Happens in One ALD Cycle?

Using the most common binary ALD process as an example (two reactants, A/B):

1. A pulse: precursor A enters the chamber and reacts with surface active sites until saturation (self-limiting).

2. Purge / pump: excess A and gaseous byproducts are removed.

3. B pulse: precursor B reacts with the new surface groups formed after the A step—again to saturation (self-limiting).

4. Purge / pump again: excess B and gaseous byproducts are removed.

5. GPC (Growth Per Cycle): the thickness (or equivalent deposited amount) added per completed ALD cycle. In many cases,

thickness ≈ number of cycles × GPC.

Box | The ALD Window and “Saturation Curves”

1. Self-limiting behavior must be verified by saturation: at a fixed temperature, gradually increase the dose/pulse time/residence time of A (or B). The GPC first increases and then reaches a plateau; the plateau region is the evidence that surface sites are saturated and the process is self-limiting.

2. Insufficient purge can create “false self-limiting” behavior: if residual A and B meet simultaneously in the gas phase and/or on the surface, CVD-like side reactions may occur. GPC may increase, but defects typically increase as well.

3. The ALD window is a process window: within a certain temperature range, GPC remains relatively stable (less sensitive to temperature) and closer to ideal linear behavior.

4. Too high a temperature or too large a dose can become CVD-like: non-self-limiting growth may appear (GPC continues to rise with dose/temperature), along with increased particles/roughness or compositional deviation.

B3. Core Characteristics of ALD

1. Precise thickness control: nanometer/sub-nanometer precision via cycle counting.

2. Excellent conformality: more favorable for high-aspect-ratio (high-AR) structures.

3. Tunable composition: doping, mixed oxides, and nanolaminates are possible (depending on precursor chemistry).

4. Limitation: typically slower throughput, because the cadence of pulse + purge + self-limited reactions sets the cycle time.

B4 | Quick Overview of Common ALD Variants

Variant	Full name (EN/CN)	Core mechanism	Main advantages	Notes / cautions
Thermal ALD	Thermal Atomic Layer Deposition	Self-limiting surface-reaction cycles driven primarily by thermal energy (two-step or multi-step)	Good control of film quality and interfaces; mature process windows	Temperature may be relatively high; limited low-temperature capability if precursor reactivity is insufficient
PEALD	Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition	Plasma/active radicals replace or strengthen thermally driven half-reactions	Can significantly reduce temperature; can improve density/stoichiometry	Must balance plasma-related variables: damage, surface modification, defect states; recommended to distinguish remote vs direct plasma schemes
SALD / sALD	Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition	Separates A/B by spatial zones; substrate moves continuously through different atmospheres	Eliminates purge time → much higher throughput; can be developed in atmospheric-pressure versions	Isolation and cross-talk control become critical; edge effects and gas-flow design are complex; scale-up is a key engineering challenge
AP-SALD	Atmospheric-Pressure SALD	One atmospheric/ambient implementation path of SALD	Easier potential scale-up; potentially lower equipment cost	Higher demands on gas isolation and reactor structure
Batch ALD	Batch Atomic Layer Deposition	Processes multiple wafers/parts at once to increase output per unit time	Higher capacity; lower unit cost	Requires managing wafer-to-wafer uniformity and loading effects; more dependent on reactor engineering

B5 | From ALE to ALD: The Shortest Historical Line

1. Starting in 1974 (developing through the 1970s): Tuomo Suntola advanced and named ALE (Atomic Layer Epitaxy). Do not confuse this with ALE = Atomic Layer Etching. ALE was initially closely tied to thin-film needs for electroluminescent displays.

2. 1980s–2000s: The concept and material systems expanded, gradually generalizing from an “epitaxy context” to the broader ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition).

3. After the 2000s: As device structures moved toward 3D architectures and ultrathin layers became more critical, ALD’s importance in microelectronics manufacturing rose significantly.

B6 | ALD Application Map 

Application scenario	Why ALD is hard to replace	Typical materials/layers (examples)
High-aspect-ratio structures (e.g., 3D NAND)	Self-limiting reactions enable superior conformality and thickness precision; however, at extreme AR, incomplete coverage can still occur and may require modeling/optimization	Various dielectrics/barriers/functional films (node- and process-dependent)
High-k gate dielectrics	Ultrathin, uniform films with better controllability of defects; HfO₂ is one of the mainstream industrial high-k systems	HfO₂, ZrO₂, and stacked/doped systems
Interfaces and barrier/encapsulation (microelectronics/displays/packaging)	Ultrathin dense barrier layers and interface passivation can strongly affect reliability	Al₂O₃ moisture barriers/passivation layers; metal nitrides, etc. (product-dependent)
Coating porous particles and complex 3D surfaces	Enables uniform, dense, thin “full conformal coating” over complex geometries	Catalyst/battery interfacial layers, anti-corrosion protection layers, etc.

B7 | Current Status and Challenges of ALD

Challenge	Why it happens	Common mitigation directions
Lower throughput (slow)	High time fraction spent on “pulse + purge”	SALD/AP-SALD, Batch ALD, reactor and process-flow optimization
High precursor barrier	It is difficult to simultaneously satisfy volatility, self-limiting reactivity, low residue, and high film quality	New precursor and co-reactant development; mechanism- and database-driven screening
Conformality deviation at extreme high AR	Coupled mass transport and reaction can cause the bottom to be “starved” of reactants or remain unsaturated	Modeling + new process windows (dose/residence time/pressure, etc.) optimization
Nucleation delay / initial nonlinearity	Inert starting surfaces are hard to initiate on; ultrathin layers are more sensitive	Surface activation, seed layers, enhancement strategies using plasma/ozone, etc. (material-dependent)
Selective deposition remains difficult	Must achieve “grow where it should” and “never grow where it shouldn’t”	ASD/AS-ALD (Area-Selective Deposition / Area-Selective ALD): inhibitor-based routes, selective surface chemistry, inherent selectivity, etc.; strongly tied to advanced manufacturing
Synergy with etching (atomic-scale processing)	3D integration requires atomic-level control for both deposition and removal	ALE (Atomic Layer Etching) synergized with ALD: self-limiting cyclic removal to improve repeatability and selectivity

Part C | Relationship and Comparison Between ALD and CVD

C1. Are They Related?

Yes. Both belong to the vapor-phase deposition family in which gas-phase precursors undergo chemical reactions on a substrate surface to form solid thin films. In some authoritative classifications, Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD, Atomic Layer Deposition) is regarded as a special type of Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD, Chemical Vapor Deposition), distinguished by sequential, self-limiting surface reactions.

The key differences are:

1. CVD is typically continuous (or near-continuous) feed with continuous growth;

2. ALD emphasizes separate, sequential introduction of precursors A/B, self-limiting reactions in each step, and thickness control by cycle count.

C2. Core Differences at a Glance

Terminology: AR = Aspect Ratio (depth/width); GPC = Growth Per Cycle.

Dimension	CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition)	ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition)
Feed mode	Typically continuous feed; reactants may coexist	A/B sequential pulses (or spatial separation), sequential reactions
Growth behavior	Potentially high rate; may be influenced by mass transport and gas-phase side reactions	Self-limiting reactions; thickness ≈ cycles × GPC, linear and intuitive
Thickness control	Can be very good (via time/flow/monitoring), but depends more on process stability	Extremely strong (angstrom-level control via cycle counting)
Conformality (high AR)	Depends on conditions and geometry; deep features are harder	Generally stronger; even so, at extreme AR it can deviate from ideal and requires dose/residence-time/modeling optimization
Temperature window	Very broad; thermal CVD often mid-to-high temperature, PECVD can significantly lower temperature	Also broad; thermal ALD is often low-to-mid temperature, PEALD can further lower temperature or improve film quality
Throughput	Usually higher	Usually lower; SALD (Spatial ALD) / Batch ALD can boost throughput
Precursor chemistry constraints	Relatively more flexible, but side reactions/particles must be controlled	Precursors must support self-limiting reactions and removable byproducts—higher chemistry threshold
Initial nucleation / surface sensitivity	Surface matters, but “site-limited saturation” is not usually the core logic	More surface-sensitive; nucleation delay may occur, especially critical for ultrathin films
Epitaxy / single-crystal capability	MOCVD/MOVPE are mainstream for compound-semiconductor epitaxy	Epitaxial / quasi-epitaxial ALD exists in research, but is generally less common than MOCVD/MOVPE in industrial mainstream epitaxy
Typical strengths	Throughput, mature material sets, epitaxy (MOCVD/MOVPE)	Ultrathin precision, uniform 3D conformal coating, interface engineering

C3. A Practical “Decision Tree” for Process Selection

The problem you face	Prioritize	Why	Common additional checks
Deep holes/deep trenches/porous particles; sidewalls and bottoms must be equally thick (high AR)	ALD	Self-limiting reactions favor conformal, uniform coating	Extreme AR still needs process + modeling optimization
Only a few nm; very tight thickness tolerance	ALD	Thickness is controlled by cycle count—direct and predictable	Watch for nucleation/initial-growth effects that impact ultrathin uniformity
Thick films or high-throughput, low-cost mass production	CVD	Continuous growth offers a clear throughput advantage	Choose LPCVD/PECVD, etc. based on thermal budget
Temperature must be low (tight thermal budget)	PECVD or PEALD	Plasma enhancement can reduce temperature / improve reactivity	Evaluate plasma-related damage and film-quality trade-offs
Target is a compound-semiconductor epitaxial layer (single crystal / active device layers)	MOCVD/MOVPE (CVD branch)	Mature epitaxy industry chain; scalable	ALD epitaxy is a research direction—position cautiously for engineering use

Part D | Common Core Chemicals for ALD/CVD

Category	Chemical name	CAS	Role
Carrier / dilution / purge	Nitrogen / N₂	7727-37-9	Carrier gas, dilution, ALD purge (during purge/pump steps); reduces gas-phase side reactions and contamination risk
Carrier / dilution / purge	Argon / Ar	7440-37-1	Inert carrier/purge gas; commonly used in plasma systems and high-purity gas lines
Carrier / dilution / purge	Helium / He	7440-59-7	Inert carrier/purge gas; also used for leak checking and thermal-conductivity-related process control (line-dependent)
Oxygen source / oxidizing co-reactant	Water / H₂O	7732-18-5	The classic ALD oxidant co-reactant (e.g., Al₂O₃: TMA/H₂O); also used in some CVD hydrolysis/oxidation routes
Oxygen source / oxidizing co-reactant	Oxygen / O₂	7782-44-7	Common reaction gas for CVD/PECVD; in ALD/PEALD can serve as an oxidant or plasma oxygen source
Oxygen source / strong oxidizing co-reactant	Ozone / O₃	10028-15-6	Strong oxidant commonly used in ALD (enables lower temperature, higher driving force/film density); also used for surface activation/organic residue removal (process-dependent)
Oxygen source / oxidizer	Hydrogen peroxide / H₂O₂	7722-84-1	Oxidant / surface-chemistry enhancement (used in some ALD/CVD chemistries and cleaning/activation strategies)
Common in oxygen/oxidation/plasma systems	Nitrous oxide / N₂O	10024-97-2	One common oxygen source (especially in plasma/high-temperature systems) for some oxide depositions and reactivity tuning
Nitrogen source / nitridation co-reactant	Ammonia / NH₃	7664-41-7	Key N source for nitride deposition (CVD/MOCVD/ALD/PEALD: e.g., SiNₓ, TiN, AlN, GaN systems)
Reducing / hydrogen source	Hydrogen / H₂	1333-74-0	Reducing gas/carrier (e.g., metal CVD reduction, annealing, plasma-assisted reduction); also a common carrier in some MOCVD/epitaxy processes (chemistry-dependent)
Strong reducing / special co-reactant	Hydrazine / N₂H₄	302-01-2	Strong reducer / N source / surface-reaction enhancement (more research or niche windows; strict safety and compliance requirements)
Dopant / dopant source gas	Diborane / B₂H₆	19287-45-7	Typical boron dopant source (B doping) for semiconductor CVD/epitaxy/doping processes (high-hazard gas)
Dopant / dopant source gas	Phosphine / PH₃	7803-51-2	Typical phosphorus dopant source (P doping); common in semiconductor CVD/epitaxy (high-hazard gas)
Dopant / dopant source gas	Arsine / AsH₃	7784-42-1	Typical arsenic dopant/epitaxy source (As doping; III–V related); highly toxic/high hazard (strict abatement and monitoring required)
Chamber clean / plasma clean	Nitrogen trifluoride / NF₃	7783-54-2	Common remote-plasma cleaning gas for PECVD/ALD tools (removes deposition residues; supports stable high-volume manufacturing)
Chamber clean / etch-related	Carbon tetrafluoride / CF₄	75-73-0	Fluorine-containing cleaning/etch process gas (reactor/recipe-dependent; also used to establish plasma chemical environments)
Si precursor (common in CVD)	Dichlorosilane / DCS (H₂SiCl₂)	4109-96-0	Typical Si source in CVD routes for Si, SiNₓ, SiO₂, etc. (often paired with NH₃/O₂/N₂O, etc.)
Si precursor (common in CVD)	Silicon tetrachloride / SiCl₄	10026-04-7	Halide Si source used in some CVD/reaction systems; halogen byproducts, corrosion, and abatement must be evaluated
Si precursor (common in CVD)	Silane / SiH₄	7803-62-5	Classic Si source (polysilicon, SiNₓ, SiOₓ, etc.); strict control needed for gas-phase reactions, safety, and explosion risk
Si precursor (sol–gel silica & CVD)	Tetraethyl orthosilicate / TEOS	78-10-4	Common precursor for SiO₂ deposition/film formation (e.g., some CVD/PECVD/process variants)
Al precursor (ALD flagship)	Trimethylaluminum / TMA	75-24-1	The classic ALD precursor (Al₂O₃: TMA/H₂O or TMA/O₃); also used for interface passivation/barrier layers
Al precursor (also seen in CVD/research)	Triethylaluminum / TEA	97-93-8	One Al source / reaction-assisting precursor; used in some CVD/epitaxy or specific film systems (high safety requirements)
Ti precursor (traditional halide)	Titanium tetrachloride / TiCl₄	7550-45-0	Common Ti source for TiO₂/TiN systems (paired with H₂O/O₃/NH₃/plasma); halogen byproducts must be managed
Ti precursor (common in ALD)	Tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium(IV) / TDMAT (Ti(NMe₂)₄)	3275-24-9	Common Ti source for ALD/PEALD (TiN/TiO₂ windows); often more favorable for low-temperature and controllable surface reactions
Hf precursor (high-k, key)	Hafnium tetrachloride / HfCl₄	13499-05-3	One common Hf source for high-k systems (e.g., HfO₂); halide route requires corrosion/byproduct evaluation
Hf precursor (mainstream high-k family)	Tetrakis(diethylamido)hafnium(IV) / TDEAHf (Hf(NEt₂)₄)	19824-55-6	Common ALD precursor family for HfO₂/stacked/doped high-k films (aligned with “self-limiting + low residue” goals)
Zr precursor (high-k/oxides)	Tetrakis(diethylamido)zirconium(IV) / TDEAZr (Zr(NEt₂)₄)	13801-49-5	Common ALD precursor family for ZrO₂ and related stacks/doped films (paired with H₂O/O₃/plasma oxygen sources)
Zn precursor (classic ZnO)	Diethylzinc / DEZ (ZnEt₂)	557-20-0	One of the most classic Zn sources for ZnO ALD/CVD (DEZ/H₂O, DEZ/O₃, etc.); demands strong repeatability and safety control
W precursor (CVD/ALD metallization)	Tungsten hexafluoride / WF₆	7783-82-6	Key precursor for W metal films and some fill processes (high volatility, strongly corrosive/reactive; abatement and materials compatibility are critical)
III–V / MOCVD epitaxy precursor	Trimethylgallium / TMG (GaMe₃)	1445-79-0	Common Ga source for GaN/GaAs and other III–V/nitride epitaxy (with NH₃, etc.); high demands on reactor design and safety
III–V / MOCVD epitaxy precursor	Triethylgallium / TEG (GaEt₃)	1115-99-7	Another common Ga source; differs from TMG in window/side reactions/carbon incorporation—chosen by process target
III–V / MOCVD epitaxy precursor	Trimethylindium / TMI (InMe₃)	3385-78-2	Common In source for InGaN/InP epitaxy; high-purity supply chain, abatement, and safety are hard requirements

Aladdin: https://www.aladdinsci.com/