Technical articles

Degreasing Agents from a Molecular-Structure Perspective: How AEO, APG, and Related Surfactants Can Replace Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE)

1. The Essence of Degreasing Agents: Regulating the Interfacial Relationships Among Oil, Water, and Surfaces

 

In household and personal-care cleaning products, “degreasing” does not simply mean dissolving oily soils. Instead, surfactants change the interfacial relationships among oil, water, and the surface being cleaned. As a result, oily soils originally attached to the surface can be wetted, penetrated, detached, emulsified, dispersed, and ultimately carried away by water. Oily soils are difficult to remove with water alone mainly for three reasons:

 

Why oily soils are difficult to clean

Requirements for a degreasing system

Oil and water are immiscible

The oil–water interfacial tension needs to be reduced

Oily soils readily adhere to substrate surfaces

Wetting, penetration, and detachment capability are required

Detached oily soils may redeposit on the surface

Emulsification, dispersion, and anti-redeposition capability are required

 

Surfactants can perform degreasing functions because their molecules have an “amphiphilic structure”: one end is oil-affinitive, while the other end is water-affinitive.

 

Molecular structural part

Functional logic

Hydrophobic end

Approaches the oily soil, enters the oil phase, or adsorbs onto the surface of the oily soil

Hydrophilic end

Interacts with the aqueous phase, allowing the oily soil to be carried by water

Overall amphiphilic structure

Arranges at the oil–water interface and reduces interfacial tension

 

Therefore, the degreasing process can be understood as a continuous process of interfacial regulation: wetting and spreading → penetration/roll-up → emulsification and dispersion → partial micellar solubilization or mixed-micelle stabilization → rinsing/wiping away. To judge whether a degreasing agent is effective, it is necessary to consider whether its molecular structure can efficiently enter the oil–water interface, whether it matches the target oily soil, and whether it can work synergistically with other components in the formulation.

 

2. Why Nonylphenol Ethoxylates Were Once Effective

 

Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) are nonionic surfactants belonging to the alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEO) family. They were once used in cleaners, detergents, textile auxiliaries, industrial cleaning, and other fields mainly because they provided good wetting, emulsification, dispersion, and solubilization performance, while also offering a relatively favorable balance between cost and performance.

 

2.1 Typical Structure of NPE

NPE can be represented by the following simplified general formula:

CH₁₉–CH₄–O(CHCHO)nH

Commercial NPE products are usually not single pure compounds, but mixtures containing different nonyl isomers and distributions of different ethylene oxide addition numbers.

 

Structural unit

Meaning

Function

CH₁₉–CH₄–

Nonylphenyl hydrophobic end

Approaches oily soils and provides oil affinity and interfacial adsorption capability

–O–(CH₂CHO)nH

Polyoxyethylene hydrophilic chain

Provides water solubility and enables the molecule to disperse in the aqueous phase

n

Number of ethylene oxide units added

Affects hydrophilicity, cloud point, emulsification ability, and application temperature

 

The longer the ethylene oxide (EO) chain segment, the stronger the hydrophilicity of the molecule generally becomes; when the EO chain segment is shorter, oil affinity becomes relatively more pronounced. By adjusting the EO number, the wetting, emulsification, cloud point, and water-solubility behavior of NPE can be modified.

 

2.2 The Degreasing Ability of NPE Comes from Structural Division of Function

The cleaning effect of NPE comes from its amphiphilic structure. During degreasing, the hydrophobic end of NPE approaches the oily soil, while the hydrophilic end remains in the aqueous phase. After the molecules arrange at the oil–water interface, they reduce the oil–water interfacial tension, making it easier for oily soils to detach from the surface being cleaned and then become emulsified, dispersed, or solubilized.

 

Structural feature

Resulting interfacial behavior

Contribution to degreasing

Nonylphenyl hydrophobic end

Interacts with oily soils

Helps the surfactant approach the oily soil

EO hydrophilic chain

Forms hydration interactions with the aqueous phase

Allows dispersed oily soils to remain in the aqueous phase

Nonionic structure

Usually does not readily form insoluble salts with calcium and magnesium ions, giving it relatively good hard-water tolerance

Helps maintain cleaning stability in complex systems

Adjustable EO number

Changes the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance

Adapts to different oily soils and formulation requirements

 

Mechanism of NPE: one end captures the oily soil, the other enters the aqueous phase, and the EO chain in between regulates water solubility and emulsification capacity. It is this structure that allows NPE to perform key degreasing actions such as wetting, detachment, emulsification, dispersion, and solubilization.

 

3. Why Degreasing Agents Based on Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE) Need to Be Replaced

 

The direct reason for replacing NPE/APEO is the environmental and regulatory risk associated with nonylphenol-related structures. In the environment, NPE may undergo processes such as shortening and oxidation of the ethoxylate chain, forming degradation products including short-chain NPE, nonylphenol carboxylates, and nonylphenol. Among these, NP and some short-chain degradation products have attracted attention due to their aquatic toxicity, persistence, and potential endocrine-disrupting effects.

 

The EU REACH regulation imposes restrictions on the placing on the market and use of nonylphenol (NP) and nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) in specific applications and at specific concentration thresholds. For example, when NP/NPE are present as substances or in mixtures at concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1% w/w in applications such as industrial and institutional cleaning, domestic cleaning, textile and leather processing, metalworking, cosmetics, and personal-care products, they are subject to restrictions. NPE in textile articles that can be washed in water during their normal life cycle is also restricted when the concentration is equal to or greater than 0.01% w/w. China’s List of Key New Pollutants for Control (2023 Edition) has listed nonylphenol as a key controlled substance and clearly prohibits the use of nonylphenol as an auxiliary in the production of pesticide products, the use of nonylphenol to produce nonylphenol ethoxylates, and the use of nonylphenol as a cosmetic ingredient.

 

Therefore, the essence of replacing nonylphenol-related systems is to use new surfactant structures to accomplish similar interfacial tasks:

 Retain effective functions such as wetting, penetration, emulsification, dispersion, and solubilization;

 Avoid continued reliance on alkylphenol structures;

 Reduce environmental, regulatory, and restriction-related risks;

 Build APEO-free systems that are more suitable for the development of household and personal-care cleaning products.

 

4. Typical Alternative Structures: Why Different Products Can Work

 

A nonylphenol replacement system is usually not built from a single product that performs all functions. Instead, it is generally constructed from multiple types of surfactants and auxiliaries working together.

 

Among them, alcohol ethoxylates (AEO) often serve as important nonionic degreasing, emulsifying, and solubilizing components; alkyl polyglucosides (APG) and glucamides are used to improve mildness and emulsion stability; linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS), alcohol ether sulfates (AES), and alpha-olefin sulfonates (AOS) are used to enhance basic cleaning, foam, and soil dispersion; cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) and amine oxides are used to improve foam stability, mildness, and system compatibility.

 

4.1 AEO: Replacing the Alkylphenol Hydrophobic End with a Fatty Alcohol Hydrophobic Chain

AEO is a common direction for NPE replacement in household and personal-care degreasing systems. Its typical structure is:

R–O–(CHCHO)nH

 

Here, R represents the fatty alcohol alkyl chain, and –(CHCHO)nH represents the EO hydrophilic chain.

The similarity between AEO and NPE lies in the fact that both have a hydrophobic end and an EO hydrophilic chain, both are nonionic surfactants, and both can arrange at the oil–water interface and reduce interfacial tension. The key difference is that the hydrophobic end of NPE is a nonylphenyl structure, whereas the hydrophobic end of AEO is a fatty alcohol alkyl chain.

 

Comparison item

NPE

AEO

Simplified structure

CH₁₉–CH₄–O(CHCHO)nH

R–O–(CHCHO)nH

Hydrophobic end

Nonylphenyl

Fatty alcohol alkyl chain

Hydrophilic end

EO chain

EO chain

Surfactant type

Nonionic

Nonionic

Replacement logic

Provides wetting, emulsification, and solubilization capability

Retains the EO-based nonionic structure while replacing the alkylphenol structure with a fatty alcohol chain

 

AEO can undertake the main degreasing function because its hydrophobic chain can enter the oil phase, while its EO chain can form hydration interactions with the aqueous phase. When the molecule is located at the oil–water interface, it can reduce oil–water interfacial tension, allowing oily soils to detach more easily from the surface and become emulsified. The performance of AEO is not fixed; it is closely related to the hydrophobic-chain length and the EO number.

 

Structural parameter

Effect on performance

Shorter hydrophobic chain

Better water solubility and faster wetting, but may provide insufficient oil affinity for heavy oily soils

Longer hydrophobic chain

Stronger oil affinity and more favorable interaction with oily soils, but water solubility and low-temperature stability need attention

Lower EO number

Stronger oil affinity and suitable for emulsifying certain oily soils, but water solubility may be weaker

Higher EO number

Stronger hydrophilicity, better water solubility and rinsability, but affinity for certain oily soils may decrease

 

4.2 APG: Using a Sugar-Based Hydrophilic Head to Improve Mildness and Emulsion Stability

The typical structure of APG can be simplified as:

R–O–(Glu)m

Here, R represents the alkyl hydrophobic chain, Glu represents the glucosyl unit, and m represents the average degree of polymerization. Actual APG products are usually mixtures with different alkyl-chain lengths and different degrees of glycoside polymerization.

 

The common feature of APG and AEO is that both have an amphiphilic structure consisting of a “hydrophobic end + hydrophilic end.” The difference is that the hydrophilic end of AEO is an EO chain, whereas the hydrophilic end of APG is a sugar-based structure.

 

Comparison item

AEO

APG

Hydrophobic end

Fatty alcohol alkyl chain

Alkyl chain

Hydrophilic end

EO chain

Sugar-based group

Surfactant type

Nonionic

Nonionic

Main function

Degreasing, emulsification, solubilization

Mildness, emulsion stability, and synergistic cleaning

 

The sugar-based hydrophilic head of APG has strong hydrophilicity and usually helps improve system mildness and emulsion stability. Actual mildness is still related to alkyl-chain distribution, residual fatty alcohol, pH, dosage, and the overall formulation system. Its hydrophobic alkyl chain can still participate in interactions at the oily-soil interface, so APG can help emulsify and disperse oily soils.

 

Structural parameter

Effect on performance

Shorter alkyl chain

Better water solubility and foam performance

Longer alkyl chain

Stronger oil affinity and potentially improved ability to emulsify oily soils, but solubility needs attention

Variation in glycoside polymerization degree

Affects hydrophilicity, viscosity, foam, and system compatibility

 

The value of APG lies in its role as a synergistic component in compound systems, improving emulsion stability, mildness, and overall formulation performance.

 

4.3 Glucamides: Enhancing Mild Cleaning and Emulsification Synergy Through a Polyhydroxy Structure

Glucamide surfactants are usually composed of a fatty chain, an amide linkage, and a polyhydroxy sugar-derived hydrophilic part. Their simplified structure can be represented as:

R–CO–N(R')–Glu

Here, R represents the fatty chain, and Glu represents an open-chain polyhydroxy hydrophilic structure derived from glucose.

 

The structural characteristics of glucamides are as follows: the fatty chain provides oil affinity, the polyhydroxy structure provides hydrophilicity, and the amide structure helps improve intermolecular interactions and system compatibility.

 

Structural feature

Effect on performance

Fatty chain

Participates in interactions at the oily-soil interface

Polyhydroxy hydrophilic structure

Provides hydrophilicity and mildness

Amide linkage

Improves emulsion stability and formulation compatibility

 

In nonylphenol replacement systems, glucamides usually do not serve as the sole primary degreasing agent. Instead, they are used to improve mild cleaning, emulsion stability, and compound-system performance. They are suitable for combination with AEO, APG, AES, and other surfactants in household and personal-care products that require both mildness and cleaning efficiency.

 

4.4 LAS: Enhancing Detergency, Foam, and Dispersion Through an Anionic Head Group

The typical structure of LAS can be represented as:

R–CH₄–SO₃⁻M

Here, R represents a linear alkyl group, –CH₄– is the benzene-ring structure, SO₃⁻M is the sulfonate anionic hydrophilic head group, and M is commonly Na.

 

LAS is an anionic surfactant. Its hydrophobic end can interact with oily soils or hydrophobic dirt, while the sulfonate head group carries a negative charge in water and has strong hydration ability. The main functional logic of LAS can be summarized in two points:

 

 The charged head group promotes soil dispersion:

After LAS adsorbs onto the surface of dirt particles or oil droplets, the surface becomes negatively charged. Electrostatic repulsion between particles makes them less likely to reaggregate, helping soils remain dispersed and suspended.

 

 The anionic structure enhances foam and basic cleaning:

LAS has strong foaming and detergency capabilities and can enhance the basic cleaning performance of dishwashing liquids, detergents, and similar products.

 

The advantages of LAS lie in foam generation, basic detergency, and soil dispersion. In actual formulations, LAS is often compounded with AEO, APG, CAPB, or amine oxides to balance degreasing, foam, mildness, and cost.

 

4.5 AES: Combining Foam, Cleaning, and Good Formulation Compatibility

The typical structure of AES can be represented as:

R–O–(CHCHO)n–O–SO₃⁻M

Here, R represents the fatty alcohol alkyl chain, –(CHCHO)n is the EO chain, OSO₃⁻M is the sulfate ester hydrophilic head group, and M is commonly Na.

 

AES is an anionic surfactant. Compared with fatty alcohol sulfates, AES introduces an EO chain between the hydrophobic alkyl chain and the sulfate ester head group. This structure brings three effects:

 

Structural unit

Effect on performance

R–

Provides hydrophobicity and participates in interactions with oily soils and hydrophobic dirt

–(CH₂CHO)n

Improves water solubility and formulation compatibility, and enhances mildness

–O–SO₃⁻M

Provides an anionic hydrophilic head group and enhances foaming, detergency, and dispersion

 

AES is widely used in dishwashing liquids, hand washes, and cleaning agents because it can provide both foam and basic detergency, while the EO chain improves water solubility and formulation performance. In nonylphenol replacement systems, AES does not primarily take over the nonionic emulsification and solubilization functions of NPE. Instead, it mainly undertakes foam generation, basic detergency, and soil-dispersion functions. When compounded with AEO, AEO focuses more on oily-soil emulsification and solubilization, while AES focuses more on foaming and dispersion. Together, they form a more complete cleaning system.

 

4.6 AOS: Enhancing Foam and Soil Dispersion

AOS is usually a mixture of alkene sulfonates and hydroxyalkyl sulfonates. It can be simplified as a surfactant with a long-chain hydrophobic group and a sulfonate anionic head group.

Its structural features can be summarized as:

Long-chain hydrophobic group + –SO₃⁻M sulfonate hydrophilic head group

 

The functional logic of AOS is similar to that of LAS: the long-chain hydrophobic group participates in interactions with oily soils and hydrophobic dirt, while the sulfonate anionic head group provides water solubility, foaming ability, and dispersion capability. AOS is commonly used in cleaning systems that require foam, cleaning power, and water solubility. In degreasing formulations, AOS more often undertakes basic cleaning, foaming, and dispersion functions rather than serving alone as the primary emulsifying and solubilizing component.

 

4.7 CAPB: Improving Foam Stability, Mildness, and System Compatibility Through an Amphoteric Structure

The typical structure of CAPB can be represented as:

R–CONH–(CH)₃–N(CH)₂–CHCOO

Here, R–CONH– is the fatty amide hydrophobic part. The molecule contains both a quaternary ammonium cationic structure and a carboxylate anionic structure, giving it amphoteric surfactant characteristics.

 

The function of CAPB is not simply to increase degreasing strength, but to improve the overall performance of the system.

 

Structural feature

Resulting function

Long-chain fatty amide hydrophobic end

Participates in interactions with oily soils and hydrophobic interfaces

Amphoteric/zwitterionic hydrophilic head

Improves mildness and formulation compatibility

Compounding with anionic surfactants

Improves foam stability, viscosity, and sensory feel

 

In systems containing anionic surfactants such as AES and LAS, CAPB can improve foam stability through compounding effects and reduce the irritation associated with a single anionic surfactant. For dishwashing liquids, hand-cleaning products, and mild cleaning products, the value of CAPB lies mainly in foam stabilization, improved mildness, and auxiliary thickening.

 

4.8 Amine Oxides: Enhancing Foam, Emulsification, and Oily-Soil Dispersion

The typical structure of an amine oxide can be represented as:

R–N(CH)₂–O

Here, R is a long-chain alkyl group, and –N(CH)₂–O is a strongly polar amine oxide head group.

 

Amine oxides have pronounced polarity, and their behavior can vary under different pH conditions. They are commonly used in dishwashing liquids and cleaning agents to enhance foam, foam stability, thickening, and oily-soil dispersion.

 

The functional logic of amine oxides is as follows:

 The long-chain alkyl group provides oil affinity and can participate in interactions at the oily-soil interface;

 The polar head group provides compatibility with the aqueous phase;

 When compounded with anionic surfactants, it can improve foam stability and system viscosity;

 It provides auxiliary emulsification and dispersion of oily soils.

 

Amine oxides are not direct one-to-one replacements for nonylphenol-based materials. Instead, they are performance-modifying components in compound degreasing systems.

 

5. Functional Division of Different Structures from the Perspective of the Degreasing Process

 

Degreasing is not an action completed by a single molecule alone. Rather, different structures work together at different stages.

 

Degreasing stage

Key structure

Typical products

Functional logic

Wetting and spreading

Hydrophilic head group reduces the surface tension of the aqueous phase

AEO, APG, AES

Enables the cleaning solution to quickly contact the oily-soil surface

Penetration and detachment

Hydrophobic chain enters the oily-soil phase

AEO, isomeric alcohol ethoxylates, amine oxides

Weakens the adhesion between oily soils and the substrate

Emulsification of oily soils

Hydrophobic ends surround oil droplets, while hydrophilic ends face the aqueous phase

AEO, APG, glucamides

Converts larger oily soils into relatively stable small oil droplets

Soil dispersion

Charged head groups generate electrostatic repulsion

LAS, AES, AOS

Reduces reaggregation and redeposition of soils

Micellar solubilization

Surfactants form micelles or mixed micelles

AEO, AES, APG compound systems

Stabilizes part of the oil-soluble dirt in the aqueous phase

Foam stabilization and improved usability

Amphoteric or strongly polar head groups participate in compounding

CAPB, amine oxides

Improves foam, mildness, and system stability

 

From this process, it can be seen that AEO is suitable as a primary degreasing structure because it has a good hydrophilic–lipophilic balance in oil–water interfacial action. APG and glucamides are suitable for improving emulsion stability and mildness. LAS, AES, and AOS are suitable for enhancing foam and soil dispersion. CAPB and amine oxides are suitable for improving foam stability, mildness, and system compatibility.

 

The key to replacing nonylphenol-based systems is precisely to recombine these structures according to their functions, rather than simply replacing one raw material with another.

 

6. How to Judge Whether a Replacement System Is Reasonable

 

6.1 Check Whether the Hydrophobic Chain Matches the Type of Oily Soil

Different types of oily soils have different requirements for hydrophobic chains. Animal and vegetable oils, mineral oils, sebum, and aged heavy oily soils differ significantly in composition. If the hydrophobic chain is too short, it may not interact sufficiently with heavy oily soils; if it is too long, water solubility, low-temperature stability, and rinsability may become concerns. When selecting AEO, APG, amine oxides, and related products, attention should be paid to hydrophobic-chain length and structure.

 

Type of oily soil

Key considerations

Animal and vegetable oils

Emulsification ability, foam, and rinsability

Mineral oils

Penetration, solubilization, and cosolvent synergy

Sebum soils

Mildness, emulsification, and anti-redeposition

Aged heavy oily soils

Synergy among nonionic surfactants, alkaline agents, and cosolvents

Mixed soils

Multi-structure compounding and dispersion stability

 

6.2 Check Whether the Hydrophilic Head Group Meets Water-Solubility and Rinsability Requirements

The hydrophilic head group determines the dispersibility of a surfactant in water and also affects foam, irritation, hard-water tolerance, and rinsability.

 

Type of hydrophilic head group

Typical products

Main effects

EO chain

AEO, AES

Regulates water solubility, cloud point, emulsification, and mildness

Sugar-based group

APG, glucamides

Improves mildness and emulsion stability

Sulfonate head group

LAS, AOS

Provides foaming, dispersion, and basic cleaning power

Sulfate ester head group

AES

Provides foam, detergency, and water solubility

Betaine head group

CAPB

Improves foam stability, mildness, and system compatibility

Amine oxide head group

Amine oxides

Enhances foam, viscosity, and auxiliary emulsification

 

6.3 Check Whether the HLB Is Suitable for the Target System

The hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) value is used to indicate the relative strength of a surfactant’s hydrophilicity and lipophilicity. If the HLB is too low, the surfactant may have insufficient water solubility; if the HLB is too high, its affinity for the oil phase may be insufficient. For degreasing systems, the HLB should match the type of oily soil, product form, use temperature, pH, and electrolyte content.

 

HLB is suitable as an initial screening indicator for nonionic emulsifiers. For anionic, amphoteric, and nonionic compound systems, it should also be evaluated together with CMC, cloud point, interfacial tension, foam, detergency, pH, electrolytes, and storage stability.

 

6.4 Check Whether the EO Number and Cloud Point Are Suitable for the Formulation

For products containing EO chains, such as AEO and AES, the EO number affects water solubility, cloud point, emulsification ability, foam performance, and low-temperature stability. When the EO number is lower, the product is relatively more lipophilic and may be more favorable for acting on certain oily soils, but water solubility and clarity need attention. When the EO number is higher, water solubility increases, but affinity for certain oily soils may decrease.

 

Cloud point is also important. Under certain temperature conditions, nonionic surfactants may become cloudy or undergo phase separation, affecting the appearance, storage stability, and actual cleaning performance of the formulation. Therefore, when replacing NPE, degreasing power, low-temperature stability, heat stability, clarity, and storage performance all need to be considered.

 

6.5 Check Whether Compounding Creates Synergy

The purpose of compounding is to allow different structures to undertake different tasks. A reasonable nonylphenol replacement system should simultaneously meet requirements for degreasing, foam, rinsability, stability, mildness, and cost, rather than pursuing only a single performance indicator.

 

Formulation task

Suitable products

Primary degreasing, emulsification, solubilization

AEO, isomeric alcohol ethoxylates

Mildness and emulsion stability

APG, glucamides

Foam and basic cleaning

AES, LAS, AOS

Foam stabilization, thickening, and reduced irritation

CAPB, amine oxides

Softening and penetration of heavy oily soils

Alkaline agents, cosolvents

Hard-water resistance and stable cleaning performance

Chelating agents, nonionic surfactants

 

7. Formulation Concepts for Typical Household and Personal-Care Degreasing Products

 

7.1 Dishwashing Liquid

Dishwashing liquid deals with tableware grease, animal and vegetable oils, and some mixed soils. It not only needs to remove grease, but also requires foam, rinsability, and mildness for hand contact.

A common formulation concept is:

AEO/APG + AES/LAS/AOS + CAPB/amine oxide

 

In this system, AEO undertakes primary degreasing and emulsification; APG improves mildness and emulsion stability; AES, LAS, or AOS provides foam and basic cleaning; and CAPB or amine oxide improves foam stability, viscosity, and user experience.

 

7.2 Kitchen Heavy-Duty Degreasing Cleaners

Kitchen heavy oily soils usually contain aged grease, oxidized oils, dust, and carbonized residues. They have strong adhesion, and ordinary foam-type cleaning systems may not be sufficient.

A common formulation concept is:

AEO/isomeric alcohol ethoxylate + cosolvent + alkaline agent + chelating agent

 

In this system, AEO or isomeric alcohol ethoxylate is responsible for wetting and emulsification; the cosolvent helps penetrate and soften oily soils; the alkaline agent promotes saponification of fatty-acid-type soils; and the chelating agent reduces the negative impact of hard-water ions on cleaning performance. Kitchen heavy-duty degreasing cleaners do not necessarily require high foam. Instead, they require rapid wetting, penetration, emulsification, and easy wiping.

 

7.3 Hard-Surface Cleaners

Hard-surface cleaners emphasize low residue, easy wiping, non-tacky feel, and a clean, polished surface. Excessive foam may instead increase the burden of wiping.

A common formulation concept is:

Low-foam AEO/low-foam nonionic surfactant + cosolvent + chelating agent

 

These systems should prioritize wetting, low residue, clarity and stability, and easy wiping, rather than simply pursuing high foam.

 

7.4 Mild Cleaning Products

If a product emphasizes mildness, the proportion of sugar-based surfactants such as APG and glucamides can be increased, and they can be compounded with AEO, AES, CAPB, and other surfactants.

A common formulation concept is:

APG/glucamide + AEO + mild anionic surfactant + CAPB

 

The focus of such products is not simply to pursue the strongest removal of heavy oily soils, but to achieve a balance among cleaning power, mildness, foam, rinsability, and formulation stability.

 

8. High Cost-Effectiveness Comes from Structural Matching, Not the Lowest Unit Price

 

In household and personal-care degreasing formulations, high cost-effectiveness does not mean using the cheapest raw material. True cost-effectiveness depends on the cost per unit of cleaning performance. The following factors should be considered comprehensively:

 

 Active matter content;

 Effective dosage;

 Removal efficiency for the target oily soil;

 Low- and high-temperature storage stability;

 Foam, rinsability, and residue feel;

 Compatibility with pH, electrolytes, fragrance, and preservative systems;

 Regulatory and restriction risks;

 Supply stability and batch-to-batch consistency.

 

Replacing nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) is not a simple one-to-one substitution of one raw material with another. Instead, it involves using an alkylphenol-free surfactant system to reconstruct interfacial functions such as wetting, penetration, emulsification, dispersion, solubilization, and rinsing.

 

Fatty alcohol ethoxylates such as AEO can serve as important nonionic degreasing and emulsifying components. APG and glucamides can improve mildness, emulsion stability, and formulation compatibility. Anionic surfactants such as AES, LAS, and AOS can enhance foam, basic detergency, and soil dispersion. CAPB and amine oxides help improve foam stability, viscosity adjustment, reduced irritation, and system stability. In practice, a replacement system should be comprehensively selected based on oily-soil type, HLB/cloud point, pH, electrolytes, foam, storage stability, regulatory restrictions, and the cost per unit of cleaning performance.

 

9. Representative Chemicals Related to Nonylphenol Replacement in Degreasing Agents from a Molecular-Structure Perspective: AEO, APG, and Related Products

 

Table 1. Nonylphenol-Related Reference Materials and Background Substances for Replacement Studies

 

Category

CAS No.

Aladdin Catalog No.

Name

Specification or Purity

Product Features and Applications

Nonylphenol-related reference material

9016-45-9

N1372295

Nonylphenol Ethoxylate (Tergitol NP-40)

Mixture of isomers, white flakes

Used for reference studies on the structure, nonionic surface activity, emulsification performance, and replacement systems of nonylphenol ethoxylates

Nonylphenol-related reference material

25154-52-3

N770913

Nonylphenol (mixture of isomers)

≥99.5%

Used for research on nonylphenol-related environmental risks, regulatory replacement background, and analytical methods

 

Table 2. Core Degreasing and Alternative Surfactants

 

Category

CAS No.

Aladdin Catalog No.

Name

Specification or Purity

Product Features and Applications

Primary nonionic degreasing surfactant

68131-39-5

A304365

Alcohol Ethoxylate

Mw 400–500

Contains a fatty alcohol hydrophobic chain and a polyoxyethylene hydrophilic chain; used in studies on wetting, emulsification, solubilization, and primary degreasing in nonylphenol replacement systems

Nonionic emulsifying and solubilizing surfactant

68439-49-6

C196296

Ceteareth-13

100%

Contains a long-chain fatty alcohol structure and a polyoxyethylene chain; used in studies on oily-soil emulsification, formulation solubilization, interfacial behavior, and nonionic surface activity

Sugar-based nonionic surfactant

58846-77-8

D112862

Decyl Glucopyranoside

Biochemical reagent

Contains an alkyl hydrophobic chain and a sugar-based hydrophilic head; used in studies on sugar-based surfactant structure, mild cleaning, emulsion stability, and formulation synergy

Sugar-based nonionic surfactant

68515-73-1

T476404

Decyl Glucoside (APG)

Moligand™, 60% in HO

Contains an alkyl chain and a sugar-based hydrophilic structure; used in APEO-free cleaning systems, mild cleaning, and emulsification-synergy studies

Sugar-based nonionic surfactant

110615-47-9

L196324

Lauryl Glucoside

≥40%

Contains a relatively long alkyl chain and a sugar-based hydrophilic head; used in studies on oily-soil emulsification, foam regulation, mild cleaning, and sugar-based surfactant compounding

 

Table 3. Representative Surfactants for Compounding Synergy and Mechanistic Studies

 

Category

CAS No.

Aladdin Catalog No.

Name

Specification or Purity

Product Features and Applications

Anionic surfactant

151-21-3

S432157

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS)

Anhydrous, ACS, ≥99%

Contains a long-chain alkyl group and a sulfate ester hydrophilic head; used in studies on foaming, detergency, micellar behavior, and anionic surfactant reference systems

Anionic surfactant

25155-30-0

S592217

Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS)

Anionic active matter, 85%

Contains an alkylbenzene hydrophobic end and a sulfonate hydrophilic head; used in studies on basic detergency, foam, soil dispersion, and surface activity

Anionic surfactant

68439-57-6

S304377

Sodium Alpha-Olefin Sulfonate

≥92%

Contains a long-chain hydrophobic group and a sulfonate hydrophilic head; used in studies on foaming, dispersion, detergency, and anionic surfactant compounding in cleaning systems

Anionic surfactant

9004-82-4

S196294

Sodium Polyoxyethylene Lauryl Ether Sulfate

≥25%

Contains an alkyl chain, a polyoxyethylene chain, and a sulfate ester head group; used in studies on foam cleaning, oily-soil dispersion, and synergy with nonionic surfactants

Amphoteric surfactant

61789-40-0

C665446

Cocamidopropyl Betaine

Active content 28%–32% in water

Contains a fatty amide hydrophobic chain and a betaine amphoteric head group; used in studies on foam stabilization, mildness improvement, system thickening, and compounding with anionic surfactants

Amine oxide surfactant

1643-20-5

N755731

N,N-Dimethyldodecylamine N-Oxide (DDAO)

BioReagent, ≥99%

Contains a dodecyl hydrophobic chain and an amine oxide polar head group; used in studies on foam stabilization, auxiliary emulsification, micelles, and degreasing compound systems

 

Table 4. Representative Auxiliaries, Chelating Agents, Alkaline Agents, and Cosolvents for Cleaning Systems

 

Category

CAS No.

Aladdin Catalog No.

Name

Specification or Purity

Product Features and Applications

Chelating agent

51981-21-6

T303874

Tetrasodium N,N-Bis(carboxymethyl)-L-glutamate

Effective content ≥47%

Used in studies on calcium and magnesium ion chelation, cleaning stability under hard-water conditions, phosphate-free cleaning systems, and degreasing formulation auxiliaries

Chelating dispersant

527-07-1

G104995

Sodium D-Gluconate

Pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™

Used in studies on metal-ion chelation, dispersion in alkaline systems, hard-water tolerance, and auxiliary cleaning of heavy oily soils

Chelating buffer

68-04-2

T774745

Trisodium Citrate

Anhydrous, USP

Used in studies on buffering, complexation of calcium and magnesium ions, adjustment of cleaning-system stability, and mild degreasing formulations

Alkaline agent

1310-58-3

P431767

Potassium Hydroxide

Anhydrous, ≥99.95% metals basis

Used in studies on alkaline cleaning systems, saponification of fatty-acid-type oily soils, acid–base adjustment in liquid cleaners, and heavy oily-soil treatment

pH adjuster

102-71-6

T478536

Triethanolamine

Reagent grade, ≥98%

Used in studies on acid–base adjustment, surfactant-system compatibility, auxiliary solubilization, and liquid cleaning formulations

Alkaline builder

6834-92-0

S102095

Sodium Metasilicate, Anhydrous

SiO, 44%47%

Used in studies on strongly alkaline degreasing, hard-surface cleaning, oily-soil softening, builder systems, and metal-surface cleaning

Alkaline agent

497-19-8

S141342

Sodium Carbonate, Anhydrous

≥99.5%

Used in studies on providing alkalinity, promoting oily-soil emulsification, improving cleaning power under hard-water conditions, and builder systems

Alkaline agent

1310-73-2

S580606

Sodium Hydroxide

≥98%, granules

Used in studies on strongly alkaline degreasing, aged oily-soil treatment, saponification of fatty-acid-type soils, and acid–base adjustment in cleaning systems

Cosolvent

5131-66-8

B151801

Propylene Glycol Butyl Ether

≥99% (GC)

Used in studies on oily-soil penetration, dissolution of hydrophobic dirt, hard-surface cleaning, and degreasing spray formulations

Cosolvent

34590-94-8

D108833

Dipropylene Glycol Methyl Ether

≥98%

Used in studies on surfactant cosolvency, oily-soil penetration, low-temperature stability, and hard-surface cleaning systems

Naturally derived cosolvent

5989-27-5

L106923

(R)-(+)-Limonene

≥95%, contains 0.03% alpha-tocopherol as stabilizer

Used in studies on greasy-soil dissolution, fragrance-type cleaning systems, terpene cosolvents, and degreasing formulations

Chelating agent

164462-16-2

T161558

Trisodium N-(1-Carboxyethyl)iminodiacetate

≥95% (T)

Used in studies on calcium and magnesium ion chelation, hard-water cleaning stability, phosphate-free builder systems, and degreasing formulations

Alkaline builder

10213-79-3

S100563

Sodium Metasilicate Pentahydrate

≥95%

Used in studies on alkaline degreasing, hard-surface cleaning, oily-soil softening, builder systems, and heavy-duty degreasing systems

Cosolvent

64-17-5

E111963

Ethanol

Pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99.5%

Used in studies on cosolvency in cleaning systems, quick drying, surface cleaning, fragrance dissolution, and volatile solvent systems

Cosolvent

67-63-0

I112011

Isopropanol (IPA)

AR, ≥99.7%

Used in studies on hard-surface cleaning, quick drying, auxiliary soil removal, surface degreasing, and solvent-based cleaning systems

 

Note: The products listed above are representative Aladdin products for scientific research and formulation studies. For more product specifications, grades, and COA information, please search by “product name/CAS/catalog number” on the Aladdin official website. These products are suitable for laboratory studies on surface activity, micelles, detergency, or replacement-system comparisons. Actual large-scale household and personal-care cleaning formulations still need to be re-screened based on product regulations, industrial-grade supply, active matter content, impurity control, irritation potential, cost, and application testing.

 

For more related articles, see below:

 

Understanding Brij 35: A Deep Dive into Its Role as a Nonionic Surfactant

 

Structural Basis and Laboratory Applications of Sodium Cholate as an Anionic Biosurfactant

 

From Foxglove to the Lab Bench: How Digitonin Works as a Non-ionic Surfactant

 

Understanding n-Octyl-β-D-glucopyranoside: A Non-ionic Surfactant for Research and Biotechnology

 

n-Dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM): Structure, Properties, and Applications as a Non-ionic Surfactant

 

Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate: Structure–Property–Application of an Amino-Acid–Based Anionic Surfactant

 

CTAB Demystified: Structure, Properties, and Practical Uses of a Classic Cationic Surfactant

 

Poloxamers Explained: A Comprehensive Guide to Non-Ionic Block Copolymer Surfactants

 

Non-Ionic Surfactants in Focus: Alcohol Ethoxylates, Polyethylene Glycol Trimethylnonyl Ether, and Triton™ X-100

 

Tween 20 and Tween 80 as Non-Ionic Surfactants: Structure, Properties, and Applications

 

A Panoramic Guide to Surfactants: Definitions & Mechanisms, Key Metrics, Application Scenarios, and Selection Navigation (Tables 1–3)

 

Saponins as Natural Non-ionic Surfactants: Structure, Function, and Applications

 

Non-ionic Detergents Explained: From Chemical Structure to Laboratory Use

Categories: Technical articles

Da — when not otherwise indicated, molecular weight units are daltons.   Mw — weight-average molecular weight.   Mn — number-average molecular weight.

Products are supplied for research and development use only. Not for use in humans, animals, diagnosis, or therapy.

Cite this article

Aladdin Scientific. "Degreasing Agents from a Molecular-Structure Perspective: How AEO, APG, and Related Surfactants Can Replace Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE)" Aladdin Knowledge Base, updated Jul 1, 2026. https://staging.aladdinsci.com/us_en/faqs/degreasing-agents-from-a-molecular-structure-perspective-en.html
Was this article helpful? Yes No 2 out 4 found this helpful

Shall we send you a message when we have discounts available?

Remind me later

Thank you! Please check your email inbox to confirm.

Oops! Notifications are disabled.