Degreasing Agents from a Molecular-Structure Perspective: How AEO, APG, and Related Surfactants Can Replace Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE)
Degreasing Agents from a Molecular-Structure Perspective: How AEO, APG, and Related Surfactants Can Replace Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE)
1. The Essence of Degreasing Agents: Regulating the Interfacial Relationships Among Oil, Water, and Surfaces
In household and personal-care cleaning products, “degreasing” does not simply mean dissolving oily soils. Instead, surfactants change the interfacial relationships among oil, water, and the surface being cleaned. As a result, oily soils originally attached to the surface can be wetted, penetrated, detached, emulsified, dispersed, and ultimately carried away by water. Oily soils are difficult to remove with water alone mainly for three reasons:
Why oily soils are difficult to clean | Requirements for a degreasing system |
Oil and water are immiscible | The oil–water interfacial tension needs to be reduced |
Oily soils readily adhere to substrate surfaces | Wetting, penetration, and detachment capability are required |
Detached oily soils may redeposit on the surface | Emulsification, dispersion, and anti-redeposition capability are required |
Surfactants can perform degreasing functions because their molecules have an “amphiphilic structure”: one end is oil-affinitive, while the other end is water-affinitive.
Molecular structural part | Functional logic |
Hydrophobic end | Approaches the oily soil, enters the oil phase, or adsorbs onto the surface of the oily soil |
Hydrophilic end | Interacts with the aqueous phase, allowing the oily soil to be carried by water |
Overall amphiphilic structure | Arranges at the oil–water interface and reduces interfacial tension |
Therefore, the degreasing process can be understood as a continuous process of interfacial regulation: wetting and spreading → penetration/roll-up → emulsification and dispersion → partial micellar solubilization or mixed-micelle stabilization → rinsing/wiping away. To judge whether a degreasing agent is effective, it is necessary to consider whether its molecular structure can efficiently enter the oil–water interface, whether it matches the target oily soil, and whether it can work synergistically with other components in the formulation.
2. Why Nonylphenol Ethoxylates Were Once Effective
Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) are nonionic surfactants belonging to the alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEO) family. They were once used in cleaners, detergents, textile auxiliaries, industrial cleaning, and other fields mainly because they provided good wetting, emulsification, dispersion, and solubilization performance, while also offering a relatively favorable balance between cost and performance.
2.1 Typical Structure of NPE
NPE can be represented by the following simplified general formula:
C₉H₁₉–C₆H₄–O–(CH₂CH₂O)n–H
Commercial NPE products are usually not single pure compounds, but mixtures containing different nonyl isomers and distributions of different ethylene oxide addition numbers.
Structural unit | Meaning | Function |
C₉H₁₉–C₆H₄– | Nonylphenyl hydrophobic end | Approaches oily soils and provides oil affinity and interfacial adsorption capability |
–O–(CH₂CH₂O)n–H | Polyoxyethylene hydrophilic chain | Provides water solubility and enables the molecule to disperse in the aqueous phase |
n | Number of ethylene oxide units added | Affects hydrophilicity, cloud point, emulsification ability, and application temperature |
The longer the ethylene oxide (EO) chain segment, the stronger the hydrophilicity of the molecule generally becomes; when the EO chain segment is shorter, oil affinity becomes relatively more pronounced. By adjusting the EO number, the wetting, emulsification, cloud point, and water-solubility behavior of NPE can be modified.
2.2 The Degreasing Ability of NPE Comes from Structural Division of Function
The cleaning effect of NPE comes from its amphiphilic structure. During degreasing, the hydrophobic end of NPE approaches the oily soil, while the hydrophilic end remains in the aqueous phase. After the molecules arrange at the oil–water interface, they reduce the oil–water interfacial tension, making it easier for oily soils to detach from the surface being cleaned and then become emulsified, dispersed, or solubilized.
Structural feature | Resulting interfacial behavior | Contribution to degreasing |
Nonylphenyl hydrophobic end | Interacts with oily soils | Helps the surfactant approach the oily soil |
EO hydrophilic chain | Forms hydration interactions with the aqueous phase | Allows dispersed oily soils to remain in the aqueous phase |
Nonionic structure | Usually does not readily form insoluble salts with calcium and magnesium ions, giving it relatively good hard-water tolerance | Helps maintain cleaning stability in complex systems |
Adjustable EO number | Changes the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance | Adapts to different oily soils and formulation requirements |
Mechanism of NPE: one end captures the oily soil, the other enters the aqueous phase, and the EO chain in between regulates water solubility and emulsification capacity. It is this structure that allows NPE to perform key degreasing actions such as wetting, detachment, emulsification, dispersion, and solubilization.
3. Why Degreasing Agents Based on Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE) Need to Be Replaced
The direct reason for replacing NPE/APEO is the environmental and regulatory risk associated with nonylphenol-related structures. In the environment, NPE may undergo processes such as shortening and oxidation of the ethoxylate chain, forming degradation products including short-chain NPE, nonylphenol carboxylates, and nonylphenol. Among these, NP and some short-chain degradation products have attracted attention due to their aquatic toxicity, persistence, and potential endocrine-disrupting effects.
The EU REACH regulation imposes restrictions on the placing on the market and use of nonylphenol (NP) and nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) in specific applications and at specific concentration thresholds. For example, when NP/NPE are present as substances or in mixtures at concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1% w/w in applications such as industrial and institutional cleaning, domestic cleaning, textile and leather processing, metalworking, cosmetics, and personal-care products, they are subject to restrictions. NPE in textile articles that can be washed in water during their normal life cycle is also restricted when the concentration is equal to or greater than 0.01% w/w. China’s List of Key New Pollutants for Control (2023 Edition) has listed nonylphenol as a key controlled substance and clearly prohibits the use of nonylphenol as an auxiliary in the production of pesticide products, the use of nonylphenol to produce nonylphenol ethoxylates, and the use of nonylphenol as a cosmetic ingredient.
Therefore, the essence of replacing nonylphenol-related systems is to use new surfactant structures to accomplish similar interfacial tasks:
① Retain effective functions such as wetting, penetration, emulsification, dispersion, and solubilization;
② Avoid continued reliance on alkylphenol structures;
③ Reduce environmental, regulatory, and restriction-related risks;
④ Build APEO-free systems that are more suitable for the development of household and personal-care cleaning products.
4. Typical Alternative Structures: Why Different Products Can Work
A nonylphenol replacement system is usually not built from a single product that performs all functions. Instead, it is generally constructed from multiple types of surfactants and auxiliaries working together.
Among them, alcohol ethoxylates (AEO) often serve as important nonionic degreasing, emulsifying, and solubilizing components; alkyl polyglucosides (APG) and glucamides are used to improve mildness and emulsion stability; linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS), alcohol ether sulfates (AES), and alpha-olefin sulfonates (AOS) are used to enhance basic cleaning, foam, and soil dispersion; cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) and amine oxides are used to improve foam stability, mildness, and system compatibility.
4.1 AEO: Replacing the Alkylphenol Hydrophobic End with a Fatty Alcohol Hydrophobic Chain
AEO is a common direction for NPE replacement in household and personal-care degreasing systems. Its typical structure is:
R–O–(CH₂CH₂O)n–H
Here, R represents the fatty alcohol alkyl chain, and –(CH₂CH₂O)n–H represents the EO hydrophilic chain.
The similarity between AEO and NPE lies in the fact that both have a hydrophobic end and an EO hydrophilic chain, both are nonionic surfactants, and both can arrange at the oil–water interface and reduce interfacial tension. The key difference is that the hydrophobic end of NPE is a nonylphenyl structure, whereas the hydrophobic end of AEO is a fatty alcohol alkyl chain.
Comparison item | NPE | AEO |
Simplified structure | C₉H₁₉–C₆H₄–O–(CH₂CH₂O)n–H | R–O–(CH₂CH₂O)n–H |
Hydrophobic end | Nonylphenyl | Fatty alcohol alkyl chain |
Hydrophilic end | EO chain | EO chain |
Surfactant type | Nonionic | Nonionic |
Replacement logic | Provides wetting, emulsification, and solubilization capability | Retains the EO-based nonionic structure while replacing the alkylphenol structure with a fatty alcohol chain |
AEO can undertake the main degreasing function because its hydrophobic chain can enter the oil phase, while its EO chain can form hydration interactions with the aqueous phase. When the molecule is located at the oil–water interface, it can reduce oil–water interfacial tension, allowing oily soils to detach more easily from the surface and become emulsified. The performance of AEO is not fixed; it is closely related to the hydrophobic-chain length and the EO number.
Structural parameter | Effect on performance |
Shorter hydrophobic chain | Better water solubility and faster wetting, but may provide insufficient oil affinity for heavy oily soils |
Longer hydrophobic chain | Stronger oil affinity and more favorable interaction with oily soils, but water solubility and low-temperature stability need attention |
Lower EO number | Stronger oil affinity and suitable for emulsifying certain oily soils, but water solubility may be weaker |
Higher EO number | Stronger hydrophilicity, better water solubility and rinsability, but affinity for certain oily soils may decrease |
4.2 APG: Using a Sugar-Based Hydrophilic Head to Improve Mildness and Emulsion Stability
The typical structure of APG can be simplified as:
R–O–(Glu)m
Here, R represents the alkyl hydrophobic chain, Glu represents the glucosyl unit, and m represents the average degree of polymerization. Actual APG products are usually mixtures with different alkyl-chain lengths and different degrees of glycoside polymerization.
The common feature of APG and AEO is that both have an amphiphilic structure consisting of a “hydrophobic end + hydrophilic end.” The difference is that the hydrophilic end of AEO is an EO chain, whereas the hydrophilic end of APG is a sugar-based structure.
Comparison item | AEO | APG |
Hydrophobic end | Fatty alcohol alkyl chain | Alkyl chain |
Hydrophilic end | EO chain | Sugar-based group |
Surfactant type | Nonionic | Nonionic |
Main function | Degreasing, emulsification, solubilization | Mildness, emulsion stability, and synergistic cleaning |
The sugar-based hydrophilic head of APG has strong hydrophilicity and usually helps improve system mildness and emulsion stability. Actual mildness is still related to alkyl-chain distribution, residual fatty alcohol, pH, dosage, and the overall formulation system. Its hydrophobic alkyl chain can still participate in interactions at the oily-soil interface, so APG can help emulsify and disperse oily soils.
Structural parameter | Effect on performance |
Shorter alkyl chain | Better water solubility and foam performance |
Longer alkyl chain | Stronger oil affinity and potentially improved ability to emulsify oily soils, but solubility needs attention |
Variation in glycoside polymerization degree | Affects hydrophilicity, viscosity, foam, and system compatibility |
The value of APG lies in its role as a synergistic component in compound systems, improving emulsion stability, mildness, and overall formulation performance.
4.3 Glucamides: Enhancing Mild Cleaning and Emulsification Synergy Through a Polyhydroxy Structure
Glucamide surfactants are usually composed of a fatty chain, an amide linkage, and a polyhydroxy sugar-derived hydrophilic part. Their simplified structure can be represented as:
R–CO–N(R')–Glu
Here, R represents the fatty chain, and Glu represents an open-chain polyhydroxy hydrophilic structure derived from glucose.
The structural characteristics of glucamides are as follows: the fatty chain provides oil affinity, the polyhydroxy structure provides hydrophilicity, and the amide structure helps improve intermolecular interactions and system compatibility.
Structural feature | Effect on performance |
Fatty chain | Participates in interactions at the oily-soil interface |
Polyhydroxy hydrophilic structure | Provides hydrophilicity and mildness |
Amide linkage | Improves emulsion stability and formulation compatibility |
In nonylphenol replacement systems, glucamides usually do not serve as the sole primary degreasing agent. Instead, they are used to improve mild cleaning, emulsion stability, and compound-system performance. They are suitable for combination with AEO, APG, AES, and other surfactants in household and personal-care products that require both mildness and cleaning efficiency.
4.4 LAS: Enhancing Detergency, Foam, and Dispersion Through an Anionic Head Group
The typical structure of LAS can be represented as:
R–C₆H₄–SO₃⁻M⁺
Here, R represents a linear alkyl group, –C₆H₄– is the benzene-ring structure, –SO₃⁻M⁺ is the sulfonate anionic hydrophilic head group, and M⁺ is commonly Na⁺.
LAS is an anionic surfactant. Its hydrophobic end can interact with oily soils or hydrophobic dirt, while the sulfonate head group carries a negative charge in water and has strong hydration ability. The main functional logic of LAS can be summarized in two points:
① The charged head group promotes soil dispersion:
After LAS adsorbs onto the surface of dirt particles or oil droplets, the surface becomes negatively charged. Electrostatic repulsion between particles makes them less likely to reaggregate, helping soils remain dispersed and suspended.
② The anionic structure enhances foam and basic cleaning:
LAS has strong foaming and detergency capabilities and can enhance the basic cleaning performance of dishwashing liquids, detergents, and similar products.
The advantages of LAS lie in foam generation, basic detergency, and soil dispersion. In actual formulations, LAS is often compounded with AEO, APG, CAPB, or amine oxides to balance degreasing, foam, mildness, and cost.
4.5 AES: Combining Foam, Cleaning, and Good Formulation Compatibility
The typical structure of AES can be represented as:
R–O–(CH₂CH₂O)n–O–SO₃⁻M⁺
Here, R represents the fatty alcohol alkyl chain, –(CH₂CH₂O)n– is the EO chain, –O–SO₃⁻M⁺ is the sulfate ester hydrophilic head group, and M⁺ is commonly Na⁺.
AES is an anionic surfactant. Compared with fatty alcohol sulfates, AES introduces an EO chain between the hydrophobic alkyl chain and the sulfate ester head group. This structure brings three effects:
Structural unit | Effect on performance |
R– | Provides hydrophobicity and participates in interactions with oily soils and hydrophobic dirt |
–(CH₂CH₂O)n– | Improves water solubility and formulation compatibility, and enhances mildness |
–O–SO₃⁻M⁺ | Provides an anionic hydrophilic head group and enhances foaming, detergency, and dispersion |
AES is widely used in dishwashing liquids, hand washes, and cleaning agents because it can provide both foam and basic detergency, while the EO chain improves water solubility and formulation performance. In nonylphenol replacement systems, AES does not primarily take over the nonionic emulsification and solubilization functions of NPE. Instead, it mainly undertakes foam generation, basic detergency, and soil-dispersion functions. When compounded with AEO, AEO focuses more on oily-soil emulsification and solubilization, while AES focuses more on foaming and dispersion. Together, they form a more complete cleaning system.
4.6 AOS: Enhancing Foam and Soil Dispersion
AOS is usually a mixture of alkene sulfonates and hydroxyalkyl sulfonates. It can be simplified as a surfactant with a long-chain hydrophobic group and a sulfonate anionic head group.
Its structural features can be summarized as:
Long-chain hydrophobic group + –SO₃⁻M⁺ sulfonate hydrophilic head group
The functional logic of AOS is similar to that of LAS: the long-chain hydrophobic group participates in interactions with oily soils and hydrophobic dirt, while the sulfonate anionic head group provides water solubility, foaming ability, and dispersion capability. AOS is commonly used in cleaning systems that require foam, cleaning power, and water solubility. In degreasing formulations, AOS more often undertakes basic cleaning, foaming, and dispersion functions rather than serving alone as the primary emulsifying and solubilizing component.
4.7 CAPB: Improving Foam Stability, Mildness, and System Compatibility Through an Amphoteric Structure
The typical structure of CAPB can be represented as:
R–CONH–(CH₂)₃–N⁺(CH₃)₂–CH₂COO⁻
Here, R–CONH– is the fatty amide hydrophobic part. The molecule contains both a quaternary ammonium cationic structure and a carboxylate anionic structure, giving it amphoteric surfactant characteristics.
The function of CAPB is not simply to increase degreasing strength, but to improve the overall performance of the system.
Structural feature | Resulting function |
Long-chain fatty amide hydrophobic end | Participates in interactions with oily soils and hydrophobic interfaces |
Amphoteric/zwitterionic hydrophilic head | Improves mildness and formulation compatibility |
Compounding with anionic surfactants | Improves foam stability, viscosity, and sensory feel |
In systems containing anionic surfactants such as AES and LAS, CAPB can improve foam stability through compounding effects and reduce the irritation associated with a single anionic surfactant. For dishwashing liquids, hand-cleaning products, and mild cleaning products, the value of CAPB lies mainly in foam stabilization, improved mildness, and auxiliary thickening.
4.8 Amine Oxides: Enhancing Foam, Emulsification, and Oily-Soil Dispersion
The typical structure of an amine oxide can be represented as:
R–N⁺(CH₃)₂–O⁻
Here, R is a long-chain alkyl group, and –N⁺(CH₃)₂–O⁻ is a strongly polar amine oxide head group.
Amine oxides have pronounced polarity, and their behavior can vary under different pH conditions. They are commonly used in dishwashing liquids and cleaning agents to enhance foam, foam stability, thickening, and oily-soil dispersion.
The functional logic of amine oxides is as follows:
① The long-chain alkyl group provides oil affinity and can participate in interactions at the oily-soil interface;
② The polar head group provides compatibility with the aqueous phase;
③ When compounded with anionic surfactants, it can improve foam stability and system viscosity;
④ It provides auxiliary emulsification and dispersion of oily soils.
Amine oxides are not direct one-to-one replacements for nonylphenol-based materials. Instead, they are performance-modifying components in compound degreasing systems.
5. Functional Division of Different Structures from the Perspective of the Degreasing Process
Degreasing is not an action completed by a single molecule alone. Rather, different structures work together at different stages.
Degreasing stage | Key structure | Typical products | Functional logic |
Wetting and spreading | Hydrophilic head group reduces the surface tension of the aqueous phase | AEO, APG, AES | Enables the cleaning solution to quickly contact the oily-soil surface |
Penetration and detachment | Hydrophobic chain enters the oily-soil phase | AEO, isomeric alcohol ethoxylates, amine oxides | Weakens the adhesion between oily soils and the substrate |
Emulsification of oily soils | Hydrophobic ends surround oil droplets, while hydrophilic ends face the aqueous phase | AEO, APG, glucamides | Converts larger oily soils into relatively stable small oil droplets |
Soil dispersion | Charged head groups generate electrostatic repulsion | LAS, AES, AOS | Reduces reaggregation and redeposition of soils |
Micellar solubilization | Surfactants form micelles or mixed micelles | AEO, AES, APG compound systems | Stabilizes part of the oil-soluble dirt in the aqueous phase |
Foam stabilization and improved usability | Amphoteric or strongly polar head groups participate in compounding | CAPB, amine oxides | Improves foam, mildness, and system stability |
From this process, it can be seen that AEO is suitable as a primary degreasing structure because it has a good hydrophilic–lipophilic balance in oil–water interfacial action. APG and glucamides are suitable for improving emulsion stability and mildness. LAS, AES, and AOS are suitable for enhancing foam and soil dispersion. CAPB and amine oxides are suitable for improving foam stability, mildness, and system compatibility.
The key to replacing nonylphenol-based systems is precisely to recombine these structures according to their functions, rather than simply replacing one raw material with another.
6. How to Judge Whether a Replacement System Is Reasonable
6.1 Check Whether the Hydrophobic Chain Matches the Type of Oily Soil
Different types of oily soils have different requirements for hydrophobic chains. Animal and vegetable oils, mineral oils, sebum, and aged heavy oily soils differ significantly in composition. If the hydrophobic chain is too short, it may not interact sufficiently with heavy oily soils; if it is too long, water solubility, low-temperature stability, and rinsability may become concerns. When selecting AEO, APG, amine oxides, and related products, attention should be paid to hydrophobic-chain length and structure.
Type of oily soil | Key considerations |
Animal and vegetable oils | Emulsification ability, foam, and rinsability |
Mineral oils | Penetration, solubilization, and cosolvent synergy |
Sebum soils | Mildness, emulsification, and anti-redeposition |
Aged heavy oily soils | Synergy among nonionic surfactants, alkaline agents, and cosolvents |
Mixed soils | Multi-structure compounding and dispersion stability |
6.2 Check Whether the Hydrophilic Head Group Meets Water-Solubility and Rinsability Requirements
The hydrophilic head group determines the dispersibility of a surfactant in water and also affects foam, irritation, hard-water tolerance, and rinsability.
Type of hydrophilic head group | Typical products | Main effects |
EO chain | AEO, AES | Regulates water solubility, cloud point, emulsification, and mildness |
Sugar-based group | APG, glucamides | Improves mildness and emulsion stability |
Sulfonate head group | LAS, AOS | Provides foaming, dispersion, and basic cleaning power |
Sulfate ester head group | AES | Provides foam, detergency, and water solubility |
Betaine head group | CAPB | Improves foam stability, mildness, and system compatibility |
Amine oxide head group | Amine oxides | Enhances foam, viscosity, and auxiliary emulsification |
6.3 Check Whether the HLB Is Suitable for the Target System
The hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) value is used to indicate the relative strength of a surfactant’s hydrophilicity and lipophilicity. If the HLB is too low, the surfactant may have insufficient water solubility; if the HLB is too high, its affinity for the oil phase may be insufficient. For degreasing systems, the HLB should match the type of oily soil, product form, use temperature, pH, and electrolyte content.
HLB is suitable as an initial screening indicator for nonionic emulsifiers. For anionic, amphoteric, and nonionic compound systems, it should also be evaluated together with CMC, cloud point, interfacial tension, foam, detergency, pH, electrolytes, and storage stability.
6.4 Check Whether the EO Number and Cloud Point Are Suitable for the Formulation
For products containing EO chains, such as AEO and AES, the EO number affects water solubility, cloud point, emulsification ability, foam performance, and low-temperature stability. When the EO number is lower, the product is relatively more lipophilic and may be more favorable for acting on certain oily soils, but water solubility and clarity need attention. When the EO number is higher, water solubility increases, but affinity for certain oily soils may decrease.
Cloud point is also important. Under certain temperature conditions, nonionic surfactants may become cloudy or undergo phase separation, affecting the appearance, storage stability, and actual cleaning performance of the formulation. Therefore, when replacing NPE, degreasing power, low-temperature stability, heat stability, clarity, and storage performance all need to be considered.
6.5 Check Whether Compounding Creates Synergy
The purpose of compounding is to allow different structures to undertake different tasks. A reasonable nonylphenol replacement system should simultaneously meet requirements for degreasing, foam, rinsability, stability, mildness, and cost, rather than pursuing only a single performance indicator.
Formulation task | Suitable products |
Primary degreasing, emulsification, solubilization | AEO, isomeric alcohol ethoxylates |
Mildness and emulsion stability | APG, glucamides |
Foam and basic cleaning | AES, LAS, AOS |
Foam stabilization, thickening, and reduced irritation | CAPB, amine oxides |
Softening and penetration of heavy oily soils | Alkaline agents, cosolvents |
Hard-water resistance and stable cleaning performance | Chelating agents, nonionic surfactants |
7. Formulation Concepts for Typical Household and Personal-Care Degreasing Products
7.1 Dishwashing Liquid
Dishwashing liquid deals with tableware grease, animal and vegetable oils, and some mixed soils. It not only needs to remove grease, but also requires foam, rinsability, and mildness for hand contact.
A common formulation concept is:
AEO/APG + AES/LAS/AOS + CAPB/amine oxide
In this system, AEO undertakes primary degreasing and emulsification; APG improves mildness and emulsion stability; AES, LAS, or AOS provides foam and basic cleaning; and CAPB or amine oxide improves foam stability, viscosity, and user experience.
7.2 Kitchen Heavy-Duty Degreasing Cleaners
Kitchen heavy oily soils usually contain aged grease, oxidized oils, dust, and carbonized residues. They have strong adhesion, and ordinary foam-type cleaning systems may not be sufficient.
A common formulation concept is:
AEO/isomeric alcohol ethoxylate + cosolvent + alkaline agent + chelating agent
In this system, AEO or isomeric alcohol ethoxylate is responsible for wetting and emulsification; the cosolvent helps penetrate and soften oily soils; the alkaline agent promotes saponification of fatty-acid-type soils; and the chelating agent reduces the negative impact of hard-water ions on cleaning performance. Kitchen heavy-duty degreasing cleaners do not necessarily require high foam. Instead, they require rapid wetting, penetration, emulsification, and easy wiping.
7.3 Hard-Surface Cleaners
Hard-surface cleaners emphasize low residue, easy wiping, non-tacky feel, and a clean, polished surface. Excessive foam may instead increase the burden of wiping.
A common formulation concept is:
Low-foam AEO/low-foam nonionic surfactant + cosolvent + chelating agent
These systems should prioritize wetting, low residue, clarity and stability, and easy wiping, rather than simply pursuing high foam.
7.4 Mild Cleaning Products
If a product emphasizes mildness, the proportion of sugar-based surfactants such as APG and glucamides can be increased, and they can be compounded with AEO, AES, CAPB, and other surfactants.
A common formulation concept is:
APG/glucamide + AEO + mild anionic surfactant + CAPB
The focus of such products is not simply to pursue the strongest removal of heavy oily soils, but to achieve a balance among cleaning power, mildness, foam, rinsability, and formulation stability.
8. High Cost-Effectiveness Comes from Structural Matching, Not the Lowest Unit Price
In household and personal-care degreasing formulations, high cost-effectiveness does not mean using the cheapest raw material. True cost-effectiveness depends on the cost per unit of cleaning performance. The following factors should be considered comprehensively:
① Active matter content;
② Effective dosage;
③ Removal efficiency for the target oily soil;
④ Low- and high-temperature storage stability;
⑤ Foam, rinsability, and residue feel;
⑥ Compatibility with pH, electrolytes, fragrance, and preservative systems;
⑦ Regulatory and restriction risks;
⑧ Supply stability and batch-to-batch consistency.
Replacing nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) is not a simple one-to-one substitution of one raw material with another. Instead, it involves using an alkylphenol-free surfactant system to reconstruct interfacial functions such as wetting, penetration, emulsification, dispersion, solubilization, and rinsing.
Fatty alcohol ethoxylates such as AEO can serve as important nonionic degreasing and emulsifying components. APG and glucamides can improve mildness, emulsion stability, and formulation compatibility. Anionic surfactants such as AES, LAS, and AOS can enhance foam, basic detergency, and soil dispersion. CAPB and amine oxides help improve foam stability, viscosity adjustment, reduced irritation, and system stability. In practice, a replacement system should be comprehensively selected based on oily-soil type, HLB/cloud point, pH, electrolytes, foam, storage stability, regulatory restrictions, and the cost per unit of cleaning performance.
9. Representative Chemicals Related to Nonylphenol Replacement in Degreasing Agents from a Molecular-Structure Perspective: AEO, APG, and Related Products
Table 1. Nonylphenol-Related Reference Materials and Background Substances for Replacement Studies
Category | CAS No. | Aladdin Catalog No. | Name | Specification or Purity | Product Features and Applications |
Nonylphenol-related reference material | 9016-45-9 | Nonylphenol Ethoxylate (Tergitol NP-40) | Mixture of isomers, white flakes | Used for reference studies on the structure, nonionic surface activity, emulsification performance, and replacement systems of nonylphenol ethoxylates | |
Nonylphenol-related reference material | 25154-52-3 | Nonylphenol (mixture of isomers) | ≥99.5% | Used for research on nonylphenol-related environmental risks, regulatory replacement background, and analytical methods |
Table 2. Core Degreasing and Alternative Surfactants
Category | CAS No. | Aladdin Catalog No. | Name | Specification or Purity | Product Features and Applications |
Primary nonionic degreasing surfactant | 68131-39-5 | Alcohol Ethoxylate | Mw 400–500 | Contains a fatty alcohol hydrophobic chain and a polyoxyethylene hydrophilic chain; used in studies on wetting, emulsification, solubilization, and primary degreasing in nonylphenol replacement systems | |
Nonionic emulsifying and solubilizing surfactant | 68439-49-6 | C196296 | Ceteareth-13 | 100% | Contains a long-chain fatty alcohol structure and a polyoxyethylene chain; used in studies on oily-soil emulsification, formulation solubilization, interfacial behavior, and nonionic surface activity |
Sugar-based nonionic surfactant | 58846-77-8 | Decyl Glucopyranoside | Biochemical reagent | Contains an alkyl hydrophobic chain and a sugar-based hydrophilic head; used in studies on sugar-based surfactant structure, mild cleaning, emulsion stability, and formulation synergy | |
Sugar-based nonionic surfactant | 68515-73-1 | Decyl Glucoside (APG) | Moligand™, 60% in H₂O | Contains an alkyl chain and a sugar-based hydrophilic structure; used in APEO-free cleaning systems, mild cleaning, and emulsification-synergy studies | |
Sugar-based nonionic surfactant | 110615-47-9 | Lauryl Glucoside | ≥40% | Contains a relatively long alkyl chain and a sugar-based hydrophilic head; used in studies on oily-soil emulsification, foam regulation, mild cleaning, and sugar-based surfactant compounding |
Table 3. Representative Surfactants for Compounding Synergy and Mechanistic Studies
Category | CAS No. | Aladdin Catalog No. | Name | Specification or Purity | Product Features and Applications |
Anionic surfactant | 151-21-3 | Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) | Anhydrous, ACS, ≥99% | Contains a long-chain alkyl group and a sulfate ester hydrophilic head; used in studies on foaming, detergency, micellar behavior, and anionic surfactant reference systems | |
Anionic surfactant | 25155-30-0 | Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) | Anionic active matter, 85% | Contains an alkylbenzene hydrophobic end and a sulfonate hydrophilic head; used in studies on basic detergency, foam, soil dispersion, and surface activity | |
Anionic surfactant | 68439-57-6 | Sodium Alpha-Olefin Sulfonate | ≥92% | Contains a long-chain hydrophobic group and a sulfonate hydrophilic head; used in studies on foaming, dispersion, detergency, and anionic surfactant compounding in cleaning systems | |
Anionic surfactant | 9004-82-4 | Sodium Polyoxyethylene Lauryl Ether Sulfate | ≥25% | Contains an alkyl chain, a polyoxyethylene chain, and a sulfate ester head group; used in studies on foam cleaning, oily-soil dispersion, and synergy with nonionic surfactants | |
Amphoteric surfactant | 61789-40-0 | Cocamidopropyl Betaine | Active content 28%–32% in water | Contains a fatty amide hydrophobic chain and a betaine amphoteric head group; used in studies on foam stabilization, mildness improvement, system thickening, and compounding with anionic surfactants | |
Amine oxide surfactant | 1643-20-5 | N,N-Dimethyldodecylamine N-Oxide (DDAO) | BioReagent, ≥99% | Contains a dodecyl hydrophobic chain and an amine oxide polar head group; used in studies on foam stabilization, auxiliary emulsification, micelles, and degreasing compound systems |
Table 4. Representative Auxiliaries, Chelating Agents, Alkaline Agents, and Cosolvents for Cleaning Systems
Category | CAS No. | Aladdin Catalog No. | Name | Specification or Purity | Product Features and Applications |
Chelating agent | 51981-21-6 | Tetrasodium N,N-Bis(carboxymethyl)-L-glutamate | Effective content ≥47% | Used in studies on calcium and magnesium ion chelation, cleaning stability under hard-water conditions, phosphate-free cleaning systems, and degreasing formulation auxiliaries | |
Chelating dispersant | 527-07-1 | Sodium D-Gluconate | Pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™ | Used in studies on metal-ion chelation, dispersion in alkaline systems, hard-water tolerance, and auxiliary cleaning of heavy oily soils | |
Chelating buffer | 68-04-2 | Trisodium Citrate | Anhydrous, USP | Used in studies on buffering, complexation of calcium and magnesium ions, adjustment of cleaning-system stability, and mild degreasing formulations | |
Alkaline agent | 1310-58-3 | Potassium Hydroxide | Anhydrous, ≥99.95% metals basis | Used in studies on alkaline cleaning systems, saponification of fatty-acid-type oily soils, acid–base adjustment in liquid cleaners, and heavy oily-soil treatment | |
pH adjuster | 102-71-6 | Triethanolamine | Reagent grade, ≥98% | Used in studies on acid–base adjustment, surfactant-system compatibility, auxiliary solubilization, and liquid cleaning formulations | |
Alkaline builder | 6834-92-0 | S102095 | Sodium Metasilicate, Anhydrous | SiO₂, 44%–47% | Used in studies on strongly alkaline degreasing, hard-surface cleaning, oily-soil softening, builder systems, and metal-surface cleaning |
Alkaline agent | 497-19-8 | Sodium Carbonate, Anhydrous | ≥99.5% | Used in studies on providing alkalinity, promoting oily-soil emulsification, improving cleaning power under hard-water conditions, and builder systems | |
Alkaline agent | 1310-73-2 | S580606 | Sodium Hydroxide | ≥98%, granules | Used in studies on strongly alkaline degreasing, aged oily-soil treatment, saponification of fatty-acid-type soils, and acid–base adjustment in cleaning systems |
Cosolvent | 5131-66-8 | Propylene Glycol Butyl Ether | ≥99% (GC) | Used in studies on oily-soil penetration, dissolution of hydrophobic dirt, hard-surface cleaning, and degreasing spray formulations | |
Cosolvent | 34590-94-8 | Dipropylene Glycol Methyl Ether | ≥98% | Used in studies on surfactant cosolvency, oily-soil penetration, low-temperature stability, and hard-surface cleaning systems | |
Naturally derived cosolvent | 5989-27-5 | (R)-(+)-Limonene | ≥95%, contains 0.03% alpha-tocopherol as stabilizer | Used in studies on greasy-soil dissolution, fragrance-type cleaning systems, terpene cosolvents, and degreasing formulations | |
Chelating agent | 164462-16-2 | Trisodium N-(1-Carboxyethyl)iminodiacetate | ≥95% (T) | Used in studies on calcium and magnesium ion chelation, hard-water cleaning stability, phosphate-free builder systems, and degreasing formulations | |
Alkaline builder | 10213-79-3 | Sodium Metasilicate Pentahydrate | ≥95% | Used in studies on alkaline degreasing, hard-surface cleaning, oily-soil softening, builder systems, and heavy-duty degreasing systems | |
Cosolvent | 64-17-5 | E111963 | Ethanol | Pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99.5% | Used in studies on cosolvency in cleaning systems, quick drying, surface cleaning, fragrance dissolution, and volatile solvent systems |
Cosolvent | 67-63-0 | Isopropanol (IPA) | AR, ≥99.7% | Used in studies on hard-surface cleaning, quick drying, auxiliary soil removal, surface degreasing, and solvent-based cleaning systems |
Note: The products listed above are representative Aladdin products for scientific research and formulation studies. For more product specifications, grades, and COA information, please search by “product name/CAS/catalog number” on the Aladdin official website. These products are suitable for laboratory studies on surface activity, micelles, detergency, or replacement-system comparisons. Actual large-scale household and personal-care cleaning formulations still need to be re-screened based on product regulations, industrial-grade supply, active matter content, impurity control, irritation potential, cost, and application testing.
For more related articles, see below:
Understanding Brij 35: A Deep Dive into Its Role as a Nonionic Surfactant
Structural Basis and Laboratory Applications of Sodium Cholate as an Anionic Biosurfactant
From Foxglove to the Lab Bench: How Digitonin Works as a Non-ionic Surfactant
Understanding n-Octyl-β-D-glucopyranoside: A Non-ionic Surfactant for Research and Biotechnology
n-Dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM): Structure, Properties, and Applications as a Non-ionic Surfactant
Sodium Lauroyl Sarcosinate: Structure–Property–Application of an Amino-Acid–Based Anionic Surfactant
CTAB Demystified: Structure, Properties, and Practical Uses of a Classic Cationic Surfactant
Poloxamers Explained: A Comprehensive Guide to Non-Ionic Block Copolymer Surfactants
Tween 20 and Tween 80 as Non-Ionic Surfactants: Structure, Properties, and Applications
Saponins as Natural Non-ionic Surfactants: Structure, Function, and Applications
Non-ionic Detergents Explained: From Chemical Structure to Laboratory Use
